Holiness Without Sacraments?
I am in mourning. I am mourning over the loss of sacramental living and worship in the Church of the Nazarene. Doctrinally, the C.O.T.N. does not believe in sacraments, we believe in ordinances. What does that mean? It means that our tradition, like many Holiness and Evangelical traditions birthed over the last 200 years, believe that the Eucharist and Baptism are merely symbolic gestures. They are outward signs, rememberances, traditions in the church to help us mark the life of Christ and our own faith. We do not believe that there is any presence or power of Christ, in any direct way, in participation with these elements.
The question is why? Unquestionably the majority of Christians who have ever lived have believed that God is present in the celebration of the Eucharist and works in the life of the believer through baptism. So why have the Nazarenes, like so many other evangelicals abandoned the theology of sacraments? I believe that our theology is rooted in fear in many ways. While the church has believed in God's work and presence in the sacraments, what it believes about the sacraments have long been debated. Is Christ literally in the eucharist? Does it become his blood and body? Are sins really forgiven through baptism? Many have rejected sacraments because of some church teachings that have led to a belief that salvation in its entirety can be found in the participation of the sacraments.
It is good that we reject this idea that salvation requires only baptism or taking communion, what is bad is that we have thrown out the baby with the bath water. Our desire to avoid this theology and to distance ourselves from those who hold to it has cost us deeply. We are now a people who strongly believe in God's previent grace and strive for holiness and have lost one of the basic elements of our faith for both. In our stories of salvation we talk about individual conversion, a crisis moment, a personal decision for Christ. The entire way we view and talk about our salvation is rooted in an American Individualist Modern philosophy that we can't even recognize because we are so firmly entrenched in it. Our salvation is not just about us or some moment and place. Our salvation takes us from being an individual and makes us part of a people, God's people, the body of Christ. The church is together one living breathing organism, not a group of individuals. Our salvation is not just about a moment in time, it is about the constant work of God's grace seeking, restoring, and transforming us. There may be a moment when we are understand what God has been trying to do in our life and we understand his grace, but that does not mean that is the moment it first came upon us. It may well be the moment of or forgiveness, but not the first time God has sought us out or tried to bestow his grace upon us.
This brings us back to the sacraments. The sacraments serve as a basis for our proper understanding of our salvation and an important vehicle for God's grace to be at work in our souls. Through baptism we are buried and raised with Christ and participate in his death and resurrection. In some mysterious way, as we are baptized, Christ is working in us and through us and among us and making us into his people. It is our initiation into the body of Christ. When we say it is merely some outward symbol, we strip it of its place of prominence in our salvation story. I have known Nazarenes who have refused to be baptized, great men and women of God, because they seemed to almost want to prove they could be saved without it. We have sinned as a church when we have led someone to the point of salvation, at least done our part in God's work, and have not then taken them through baptism into union with Christ. Baptism does not save us, but it is clear from Jesus' teachings, and the practices of the early church, that it is intended to be part of our story of salvation.
The Eucharist, like wise, becomes a place where we are reminded of our story, our calling, and filled with the presence of God. I don't believe in transsubstantiation, that is the belief that the bread and cup become literally the body and blood of Christ. But, I do believe that there in the cup and bread, the grace of God, the power of God, and the presence of Christ meet us in some mysterious way. As we join as a people together at the table to feast we reaffirm our connection to one another through the blood of Christ and participate together in the mercy of his sacrifice for us.
So this is a call, a desparate cry, for us to recapture sacramental theology and living as the people of God. We are only depriving ourselves and hurting our churches when we dismiss these elements as "merely symbols". We must relearn what it means to be Wesleyan and find an appreciation for the sacraments. In doing so we will find new calling and understanding of what it means to be a people of holiness.
Blessings-
Greg Arthur



12 comments:
Hey, it's great to know this kind of site exists! As a Nazarene pastor for nearly 15 years, I have to say that there is room in our "official teachings" for a sacramental approach, and my approach at the Seattle church I pastor is very much a sacramental one, concerning both baptism and eucharist. Some of our writers are much more sacramental than most Holiness Movement/Evangelical folks have traditionally been, and this gives me some hope. So, I pass this hope along to you. I see a trend toward more sacramental understandings among many young ministers (I'm still pretty young, too)in the COTN, and I continue to pray for this movement to spread.
I look forward to interacting with "kindred spirits" like yourselves more.
God bless,
Charles
Dr. Charles W. Christian, Pastor
North Seattle Church of the Nazarene
Seattle, WA
Charles,
With a name like yours how could you be anything other than a pastor. Thanks for coming and joining in on the conversation with us. I am very hopeful when it comes to the COTN and your reply just reaffirms that hope. One of the unfortunate things about many who are drawn to the Emerging Conversation is that what draws them is angst. They have so much angst about their denomination or about evangelicalism and they are searching for different answer. But for me this whole conversation is not about angst it is about rediscovering our mission as God's people. Hopefully we can recover that mission and understand what it looks like in a new postmodern world. I think you are right, there is room, and some history, of sacrament practices in the COTN. And the more churches that live and worship this way, the more impetus for changed the more inclined the denomination will be to opening up these conversations.
Blessings-
Greg
Well written Greg. I'm still put off by our statement that communion should be held at least once every three months. The experience I've had is that we've had it even less frequent than that.
I just don't understand how whether in remembrence or in a deeper meaning we wouldn't want to celebrate it as often as we gather (in one form or another). Now I know some would say that if we did it weekly or more often that would minimize the "effect" or the meaning of it. But to those I say to not do so is to neglect an opportunity to join people closer to God in a solemn event.
More later...
In my experience in the COTN there is definitely room for a good sacramental theology. I think the most influential book by a Nazarene on the topic of sacraments is Outward Sign and Inward Grace by Rob Staple where he makes a definite case for the (truly Wesleyan) understanding of the grace that is imparted by God in the sacraments.
Good post Greg.
Thanks for the responses everyone. There is a struggle with liturgy to keep it fresh and alive as you use it. Certainly many traditions and churches have failed in this challenged. But, if you have ever been in a place where it is alive and filled with mystery and excitement and the presence of God, you will have a hard time imagining worship without it. So let's delve into the challenge of using Spirit filled creativity to breath new life into our worship through sacraments and liturgy. If any of you want some good resources to check out on liturgy and different ways to celebrate the sacraments let me know because I have some suggestions.
Peace-
Greg
Greg’s post has inspired a few great conversations in my life this past week about the sacraments. In fact one person I was speaking with mentioned the book “Outward Sign and Inward Grace” that Kevin Rector mentioned in a previous comment. I have not read that book but I am at least familiar with the terminology. Like Kevin this person emphasized that our Wesleyan tradition has deeper roots that have a far better view on the sacraments than what is described in a comparably more recent and over reactive ordnance view.
Still, I think Greg’s caution in his post is warranted. We are influenced by an ordinance view and it is evident even in our stated doctrinal beliefs. Too often we speak of sacraments as “merely” outward signs to the point that we diminish the very real connection to God working in us as we participate with the sacraments.
I have been pleased by the dialogue here as well as some conversations in my life this past week with Nazarenes that embrace the reality of God meeting us in the sacraments and the mystery of it. I am encouraged that I have encountered many Nazarenes that believe in sacraments and not just mere ordinances. I also have been encouraged personally to reflect more on and not take for granted the real encounter I can have with God through the sacraments.
Thanks Greg for your post, and I will be contacting you about your suggested recourses on liturgy and different ways to celebrate the sacraments. I look forward to your future posts and the dialogue they inspire.
James
Greetings guys from up in Canada,
As someone who grew up and was educated in the Church of the Nazarene, I'm pleased to see your new site here, and will look forward to the conversation. I met Brian years ago when I stayed at his house in KC.
Grace & Peace,
Matthew
Hey all - first off, thanks to greg for this thoughtful post. realizing that this tendency toward sacramental and liturgical renewal in the CoNaz is present amongst countless unknown Nazarene family members gives me hope not only that I (and my few friends who share these convictions and have remained Nazarene, while so many have become Anglican, Catholic, Orthodox...) am not alone, but also that this might be the prophetic and providential work of the Holy Spirit and not just a passing trend, another footnote in the endless search for novelty, some way to "make it new". seriously - when I googled Nazarene+liturgy this evening, I had no idea what I might hit upon, and while the "emergent" tag provoked a knee-jerk negative reaction (mostly because I still don't quite have a bead on what it means - and we fear what we don't understand, right?), I am thrilled to have stumbled upon this discussion.
greg - you use a few words in your post that I think are crucial: "abandoned" (as in, "Why have the Nazarenes...abandoned the theology of the sacraments?") and, in your final paragraph, "recapture" and "relearn". This indicates to me that you consider the problem with the CoNaz in this regard to be one that can be solved by reform or some sense of going back. But the reality is that we don't have anything, in our *distinctive* (oh how we love that word) tradition to go back TO. As Rev. Christian's comment (the first in this tread) points out, we may well (and I believe we do) "have room" in our theology to accomodate the kind of sacramentality that I so yearn for, and it seems you do as well - and again, we are not alone. But if our approach and perspective is one of reform, recapture, rediscover, etc, I'm afraid we'll only come face to face with a void. Of course, as you rightly state, this is all an aspect of our WESLEYAN tradition, which is of course Anglican and highly sacramental, and insofar as that goes, it IS something we can recapture, relearn, etc, but it will require moving outside of the confines of our not-quite-100-year-old Nazarene history, which is as if not more influenced by the American Holiness movement that the Wesleyan-(English-)Methodist tradition (cf. Mark Quanstrom's fascinating, if incredibly America-centric study of the development of our doctrine of Sanctification, entitled A Century of Holiness Theology).
I don't have answers, mind you. Just a fervent, and I believe God-given and Spirit-led, desire to see our church move in this direction. and again, I SO appreciate your post, and this site, which I will certainly frequent. these conversations need to be taking place, for they are indeed necessary steps toward conversion. I hope this can be a place of true and continuous conversation.
by way of introduction - I am a Nazarene PK from Nashville, TN, and am currently involved in PhD work at Glasgow University (Scotland) in the Centre for Literature, Theology and the Arts. My work deals particularly with sacraments, liturgy and language in relation to postmodern culture and theory. I am also a sessional lecturer at Nazarene Theological College in Manchester, where my wife Gloria is currently working on an MA in theology. So, nice to meet you all. Peace be with you.
Brannon,
I was, as you astutely determined, referring to recapturing our more Orthodox Wesleyan theology that was abandoned or ignored from the beginning of our tradition. We wanted to be distinctive, and because that was our focus, that is what we got. We ended up with something distinctively unorthodox in light of 2000 years of sacramentalism within the church.
Hopefully we can open ourselves up to learning from other traditions that have existed long before ours.
Great dialogue everyone-
Thanks-
Greg
Thanks friends for a great blog and opportunity to see what is happening in the emrgent church sphere. I would like to cast my vote in affirmation of Greg's thoughts on sacramental theology. Even as a kid coming into the COTN through VBS, I always looked forward to our quarterly communion service. It was never merely a symbol. The presence of Christ and my sense of unity with the Body was what drew me to the Church. It wasn't until I was starting to answer my call into ministry that I encounter a Nazarene pastor who did it monthly and treated the sacrament with reverence and served it with the expectation that Christ's grace would do something in us. From then on I determined I would not go back and I experienced a whole new means of the Spirit forming my spirit. I have encountered a like passion among many but there is still fear that liturgy is a sign of not being truly Nazarene and/or indicates a dying church. I am praying that the Spirit will not be quenched by that fear and that dialogue in emergent venues like this will be used by the Spirit. I am still trying to understand the main work of the emrgent movement/dialogue. If it is anything like what I have read, here count me in!
Hi, again --
The statement above about moving toward a more "Orthodox Wesleyan" approach to things in the COTN is one that our denomination has struggled with over the past half century or more. The "battle" between the American Holiness emphasis and the "true Wesleyan" camps has been a back and forth kind of thing, it seems to me.
More and more lately I hear a desire to recognize that even though we are an American Holiness Evangelical kind of movment, we have deep Wesleyan (even Anglican!) roots!
Let the conversation continue!!
Charles
Dr. Charles W. Christian, Pastor
N Seattle Church of the Nazarene
WHITE EUCHARIST BLACK PIGS
Black Pigs
Mark 5:12 (Young's Literal Translation)
12. and all the demons did call upon him, saying, `Send us to the swine (pigs), that into them we may enter;'
http://raceequalitysecretservice.blogspot.com/2010/08/white-eucharist-black-pigs.html
Post a Comment