Monday, May 11, 2009

The New ‘Nones’ Aren’t Athiest–Just Unaffiliated

Historically, the number of individuals who say they have no religious affiliation in America ranges between 5-10%, but a new poll conducted by Robert Putnam (of Bowling Alone fame) and the Pew Forum on Faith in Public Life shows the “nones” is skyrocketing to 30-40% among Generation X and Y. At first glance this would seem like a disturbing trend, at least for those who care about the church and evangelism, but Putnam believes the opposite may be true. The declining trend in religious affiliation could in fact provide an opportunity for a revival of faith in America. In other words, as the Religious Right declines and American civil religion dies, there is room for something new to arise out of the ashes.

According to ABC News, Putnam makes clear that the majority of the “nones” are not atheist. In fact, he says, “Many of them are people who would otherwise be in church.” He continues, “They have the same attitudes and values as people who are in church, but they grew up in a period in which being religious meant being politically conservative, especially on social issues.” Young people are rejecting the overly politicized religion of their childhood and what they see as an increasingly corrupt institutional church — not God. Putnam sees an opportunity for the church. “Jesus said, ‘Be fishers of men,’ and there’s this pool with a lot of fish in it and no fishermen right now.”

It is becoming increasingly clear that young people are tired of a religion that stays silent on the great issues of our day, issues such as the environment, poverty, and education, but they are energized by a faith that leads to social action. Last week at Sojourners’ Mobilization to End Poverty, a young man approached a staff member to tell a familiar story. He grew up in a conservative church, left the faith because he could not believe in the God of his childhood, and then, one night, he heard Jim Wallis speak. Jim shared the gospel of a God who cares for the poor and the marginalized of the world and of a God who calls us to do the same. That night, he returned to Christ.

In social settings, I am often asked to explain where I work. At first, when they hear I work for a religious organization they start looking for someone else to talk with, but as I continue to explain our work you can see the spark in their eye and they’ll almost always reply, “Tell me more. I’m not a person of faith/I left the faith, but I like the sound of this.”

However, I see time and time again that young people are not interested in a watered-down faith that simply does good work or a faith that replaces the Religious Right with the Religious Left. Young people are attracted to an authentic faith in Jesus, grounded in scripture that leads to social action. A friend of Sojourners tells the story of growing up in a home that taught social justice, but not knowing why she should get out of bed for church. Then, during the midst of a struggle for racial justice in a small Texas town, a group of activists — who had been ostracized from local churches for shaking up the social order — began to sing, pray, and read scripture together. It was the worshipping community, she says, that gave them the strength to continue. She had a reason to get out of bed on Sunday. In my opinion, the church must learn to weave together social action, evangelism, a commitment to scripture, and a worshipping community if it is going to attract the growing number of “nones.” In the midst of what appears to be depressing news for religious folk, I am hopeful that something new is possible.

I think the Church of the Nazarene could easily benefit from this changing trends, because the church has a history of making space for religious entrepreneurs. But, the entrepreneurs success is dependent upon the broader churches support and investment.

(portions of this post are also at at God's Politics)

Kevin Lum is the national church and outreach coordinator at Sojourners. He also blogs at God's Politics and KevinLum.com.

9 comments:

Brian Postlewait said...

I can't even tell you how much this rings true for so many I've connected with. I think I managed to pastor a church full of them. These unaffiliated are indeed ready for and needing communities to journey within.

The strength of the future of the CON is partly dependent upon on our skill or discernment, or sensitivity to allow these people to belong before and as they believe.

Right on Kevin, great post. Thanks,

Anonymous said...

Realizing that the following study does not describe most on this blog, I wonder to what degree the study, found on the "Association of Nazarene Sociologists and Researchers"(ANSR) website, answers Lum's question that "...success [will be] dependent upon the broader churches support and investment."

Wesleyan or Fundamentalist?
Political and Theological Stances of Nazarene Pastors1
Linda Beail, Point Loma Nazarene University
Greg Crow, Point Loma Nazarene University
Presented at the 2004 annual meeting of the Association of Nazarene Sociologists and Researchers (ANSR),
Kansas City, MO, March 12, 2004

"...Nazarene pastors are overwhelmingly conservative (86.5%); only 10% call themselves moderate, and a mere 3.5% identify themselves as liberal. In fact, most believe that “it is hard to be a true Christian and a liberal” (72%).

They are almost universally Republican in their partisanship (87.8%), and they locate themselves within the staunchest segment of party loyalists: an astonishing 51.7% of Nazarene ministers chose the furthest end of the seven-point party-id scale, “Strong Republican,” as the category best describing them. Only 6% of Nazarene ministers identified as Democrats, which is somewhat surprising given the blue-collar, low socio-economic status of the denomination.

Ninety-four percent of them voted in 1996, and that rate went slightly higher to 96.6% in 2000. They voted overwhelmingly for Bob Dole in 1996 (84.8%), and almost unanimously for George W. Bush in the general election in 2000 (93.6%).'

Nazarene ministers also overwhelmingly agree (92.8%) that the church should stress individual sanctification more than transforming the social order, which..."

To me, it looks like a 80/20 split, at best. 20% is not a hopeless position from which to start, but I know many, many people who have the politics described in Lum's post and for these people, dealing with people described in the ANSR study is an ordeal to be avoided, even if they are not in one particular Nazarene Church, but in most of the others. You can pretend the crazy uncle is in the attic until the next time Dobson jerks the chain and JK Warrick pops up. Lum doesn’t address the homosexual issue. I think that ending homosexual persecution is big for most of these people, and on this issue, I doubt there is any "split" in the Nazarene Church.

I like Keven Lum's growth strategy for the Nazarene Church, but, given the ANSR reality, excepting a few isolated examples, I think these people are more likely to end up in liberal Methodist Churches, Episcopal, the UCC, or, observing current growth rates, no church at all.

Jesus Reyes

Greg Arthur said...

Jesus,

Great points about the difficulties in making this actually work for the CON because of our ultra-conservative base.

The reality of these studies both of the non church goers and of the Nazarene ministers both ring of the truth. The question is how to bridge the divide?

Unfortunately, many Nazarene churches never will. But, there are beautiful and increasing exceptions to this rule. There are many religious entrepreneurs within the church who defy these statistics. The question is will there be enough to make a difference?

Kevin Lum said...

Jesus, as a long time Nazarene, who grew up in the south, I am well aware of the problems you point out. But, young people are not going to flock to liberal mainline churches in their current state - although I see some very hopeful trends. Adam Hamilton and the Church of the Resurrection provide an interesting model of what's possible in the mainline church. There are other examples of growing and vibrant mainline churches in a recent book by Diana Butler Bass. But, almost all the growing mainline churches have a strong focus on evangelism, commitment to Scripture and are involved in social action.

It's going to take a new generation of Nazarene's and Nazarene churches to reach the "nones". I am only hopeful for the CotN if we get serious about starting and supporting new church plants - with money and people. It will be up to leaders with resources like Middendorf at OKC First, Daniels at Paz Naz, Frankin at Kankakee College and others to birth new churches and support the "religious entrepreneurs".

Maybe I'm seeing what I want to see, but through my work at Sojourners, I see extremely hopeful trends taking place in evangelical churches across the globe.

Pastor Grant said...

Kevin,

I'm curious if your conclusions apply outside of the US (in Canada where I live) where politics are not divided into Left/Right. I voted in the provincial election in British Columbia today and my options were candidates from the Liberal Party, New Democratic Party, and Green Party. Not a conservative on the ballot!

In a country like Canada that prides itself on its social consciousness (universal health care, etc.) The Christian Church in Canada has largely been silenced as a relevant voice in social policy, yet still plays a quiet and I think significant role in delivering social services in Canada.

Maybe what will attract 'nones' in the US and Canada is delivery rather than just socially conscious rhetoric which over time, if it is not backed by action, will be sniffed out as another 'church growth' strategy.

Tim Sheets said...

Maybe the "nones" need older more mature adult followers of Jesus (aka, Christians) to come alongside them and mentor them and help them find their place in God's mission and see the importance of joining the local church.

Just some thoughts.

T <><

Anonymous said...

What is the difference between this socially conscious church described herein and the mainline liberal church? There are already an abundance of churches that are intensely active in social issues, but aren't these denominations suffering serious decline?

Also, is it possible that in attempting to appeal to the “Nones” we are allowing fallen mankind to define the mission of the church? Should we be more concerned with the biblical mandate or the desires of the “Nones?”

Bill in St. Louis

Kevin Lum said...

Bill, as you point out, mainline churches are much more socially conscious than than many evangelical churches (although not necessarily that active on justice issues), but that is not the cause of their decline. Mainline churches are declining, because they gave up on evangelism and in many cases a commitment to the gospel. Furthermore, the church I describe is not an attempt to appeal to the "nones", but an attempt to live out the gospel in an authentic manner. The gospel that is not good news to the poor, is not the gospel of Jesus Christ. We cannot fully follow Jesus and yet ignore our brothers and sisters who lack food to eat, an affordable place to live and access to healthcare. We must move beyond the false divisions of the past that have separated following Jesus and social action.

Josh Broward said...

Thanks for posting Kevin. These are great thoughts, and I think our core strategy has to be living out the holistic gospel. We will either love God and love people holistically, or we will fade and die. And this is for many reasons:
1) We will be separated from the Spirit of God, because God is concerned about holistic care for all creation.
2) People understand that holistic care matters, and any kind of religion without it will be more and more obviously hollow.

Thanks again for taking the time to post here!